Legal Opinion

William Morrell and Evaristo Valle v. United States of America, and Triple "A" MacHine Shop, Inc., Respondent-Impleaded-Appellee

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 18, 1961No. 17321_1PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order.

After a judgment in the district court dismissing their libels, 193 F.Supp. 705, libelants gave notice of appeal therefrom to this court. A motion for leave to prosecute the appeal in forma pauperis and to obtain a copy of the reporter’s transcript of the trial at the expense of the United States was made to the district court. That court granted leave for libelants to prosecute their appeal in forma pauperis but denied the motion to have the reporter’s transcript prepared at the expense of the United States. The district judge said on that motion:

“It is my view that the questions on…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Morrell v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1960

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Giles E. Miller v. Meinhard-Commercial CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
  2. Lawrence Hill v. Ronald C. Marshall T.L. Morris Lt. WenteCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API