Legal Opinion

Tye v. Beausay

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Second District, Montgomery County

Decided September 29, 2017No. 27416PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHall, P.J.

{¶ 1} Matthew and Joshua Tye appeal from the trial court's entry of judgment against them on their complaint seeking to hold appellees Jeffrey Beausay and the Donahey Law Firm liable for legal malpractice and other claims.

{¶ 2} The Tyes advance three assignments of error. First, they contend the trial court erred in not finding an express or implied attorney-client relationship between them and Beausay, or a recognized substitute for such a relationship, when entering summary judgment against them on their malpractice claim. Second, they assert that the trial court erred in making its own…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Scholler v. SchollerOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Petrey v. SimonOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Simon v. ZippersteinOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Shoemaker v. GindlesbergerOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Carpenter v. LongOhio Court of Appeals · 2011

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gorsha v. ClarkDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API