Legal Opinion

Barry v. Burdines

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 23, 1995No. 94-2067PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The claimant appeals a workers’ compensation order denying a claim for wage loss benefits in excess of the 78 weeks allowed under section 440.15(3)(b)4.d.(III), Florida Statutes (1991). The claimant contends that by conditioning the duration of wage loss eligibility on the degree of physical impairment section 440.15(3)(b)4.d violates the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 USC section 12101 et seq. We conclude that the claimant has not established an ADA violation, and we therefore uphold the statutory limitation on eligibility for wage loss benefits.

Section 440.15(3)(b)4.d provides a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Key Haven Associated Enterprises, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Internal Imp. Trust FundSupreme Court of Florida · 1982
  2. Cramer v. State of FloridaDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1995
  3. O'NEIL v. Department of Transp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1985

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Barry v. BurdinesSupreme Court of Florida · 1996
  2. Cramer v. Brodell Plumbing Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API