Legal Opinion

Lazaro v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 22, 1988No. 2325Published

1Opinion of the Court

DEL SOLE, Judge:

This is an appeal from a judgement which denied Appellant’s claim for work-loss benefits and attorney’s fees under the Pennsylvania No-fault Motor Vehicle Insurance Act (No-fault Act).1 The significant issue is whether Appellant’s entitlement to work-loss benefits will be determined pursuant to the Pennsylvania No-fault Act, or the No-fault Act of the State of New York. For the reasons which follow, we reverse.

Appellant was injured in a motor vehicle accident which occurred in Pennsylvania. At the time of her accident, Appellant was a resident of the state of New York. The…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Freeze v. Donegal Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Molina v. Games Management ServicesNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Allcity Insurance v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  4. Country-Wide Insurance v. RodriguezNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Wierbinski v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API