Legal Opinion

Edward Lewis Tobinick, MD v. Steven Novella

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided February 15, 2017No. 15-14889PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

■RESTANI, Judge:.

Appellants Edward Lewis Tobinick, MD (“INR CA”), INR PLLC (“INR FL”), and M.D. Edward Tobinick (“Dr. Tobinick”) (collectively, the “Tobinick Appellants”) appeal the district court’s orders striking INR CA’s state law claims pursuant to California’s anti-SLAPP statute, twice denying amendment of the Tobinick Appellants’ complaint, denying relief pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 37, 56(d), and 60 due to potential discovery-related abuses, and granting summary judgment against the Tobinick Appellants on their Lanham Act claim. We affirm the district court in…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Davide M. Carbone v. Cable News Network, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018
  2. Edward Lewis Tobinick, MD v. M.D. Steven NOvellaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018
  3. Robert W. Otto v. City of Boca Raton, FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020
  4. Babasola Kolawole v. Stacy SellersCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2017
  5. Berisha v. LawsonDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2018

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API