Hendricks v. South Carolina Department of Corrections
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Toal
This Court certified this case for review pursuant to Rule 204(b), SCACR to review the Administrative Law Court’s (ALC) finding that Larry Hendricks (Appellant) was not entitled to relief. We affirm.
Facts/Procedural History
Appellant, an inmate at Ridgeland Correctional Institution, attempted to photocopy legal documents he created. 1 Appellant was informed that due to a change in policy he would not be allowed to photocopy his documents. Appellant filed a Grievance Form against the South Carolina Department of Corrections (SCDC) challenging the constitutionality of SCDC Policy GA-01.08,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Bounds v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Raymond Herschel Johnson v. Al C. Parke, Warden, and Beth Jones, Programs DirectorCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981
- Video Gaming Consultants, Inc. v. South Carolina Department of RevenueSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
- Pellegrino v. LoenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
3Cited by2 opinions
- Howard v. South Carolina Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2012
- Pérez López v. Departamento De Corrección Y RehabilitaciónSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 2022