McDaniel v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtPelham, J.
The court’s refusal to grant the defendant’s motion in arrest of judgment because the jury assessed a fine of $50 “and costs” against the defendant was without error. The judgment entry does not show the verdict of the jury to be in the form complained of, but, on the contrary, the verdict set out in the judgment is, in all respects, regular, and in the following words and figures: “We, the jury, find the defendant guilty, and assess his fine at fifty ($50.00) dollars. J. A. Gilliland, Foreman.”
When the statements in a bill of exceptions conflict with matters that are shown by, and properly…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Deslonde & James v. Darrington's HeirsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1856
- Hudson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1878
- Parham v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906
- State v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1841
- Ferguson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Melton v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1929