Legal Opinion

Clyde Savings & Loan Ass'n v. May Department Stores

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 8, 1981No. 80-2483PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Perlin

This appeal arises solely on the pleadings. Defendant, Ernest Oechslin, Jr. (Oechslin), contends that, after he had filed a counterclaim and without his consent, the trial court in violation of section 52 of the Civil Practice Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1979, ch. 110, par. 52) granted plaintiff, Clyde Savings & Loan Association (Clyde), leave to “withdraw its complaint.” Clyde maintains that it moved to withdraw its complaint because the action had become moot. For the reasons set forth herein, we conclude that the action was moot and affirm the order of the trial court.

The relevant facts are…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Underground Contractors Ass'n v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Illinois Gamefowl Breeders Ass'n v. BlockIllinois Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Burgard v. Mascoutah Lumber Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1955
  4. Trossman v. TrossmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1960
  5. As & W. CLUB OF WAUKEGAN v. DrobnickIllinois Supreme Court · 1962

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Sharma v. ZollarAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  2. Illinois Municipal League v. Illinois State Labor Relations BoardAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  3. First Bank of Roscoe v. RinaldiAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  4. Adams v. MeyersAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  5. Local 705, International Brotherhood of Teamsters Health & Welfare Fund v. Five Star Managers, L.L.C.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2000

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API