Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Smith

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 10, 1977No. 48,757Published

1DissentPrager, J.

The majority opinion points out quite accurately that at this stage in the development of criminal law administration there are differing evaluations and views as to the social utility and desirability of the M’Naghten, the ALI, and the Durham tests or rules pertaining to the defense of insanity in the trial of criminal offenses. In my *212judgment the time has come to reject the outmoded M’Naghten test and to adopt the test proposed by the American Law Institute Model Penal Code. Since I am not in agreement with the majority, I deem it necessary to express the reasons for my position.

First, I…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. United States v. Archie W. BrawnerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
  2. Duane Earl Pope v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
  3. Commonwealth v. McHoulMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1967
  4. United States v. Charles FreemanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
  5. State v. KrolSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API