Legal Opinion

King v. Mitchell

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1950Published

1Opinion of the Court

188 Or. 434 (1950)

214 P.2d 993

216 P.2d 269

KING

v.

MITCHELL

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Argued November 1, 1949.

Reversed and remanded February 15, 1950.

Petition for rehearing denied March 28, 1950.

E.F. Bernard argued the cause for Appellant. On the brief were Collier & Bernard and William F. Bernard, of Portland, and Yokum & Campbell, of John Day.

Harold Banta argued the cause for Respondent. On the brief were Hallock, Donald, Banta & Silven, of Baker, and E.P. Truesdell, of Canyon City.

Before LUSK, Chief Justice, and BRAND, BAILEY, HAY and PAGE, Justices.

LUSK, C.J.

Section 1-1007, O.C.L.A., provides:

"T…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. King v. MitchellOregon Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Carmichael v. CarmichaelOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Hanthorn v. OliverOregon Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Eastman v. CraryOregon Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Hall v. McConeyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1910

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API