Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Lindsley v. Phare

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 14, 1934Published

1ConcurrenceWhitfield, J.

(concurring). — Phare and wife purchased property from W. E. Randall and took title by the entireties'. The husband and wife executed a mortgage on the property to secure the purchase price. There was default in payments and the vendor mortgagee brought suit against Phare and wife to foreclose the mortgage. The bill of complaint set out other property including a described note and mortgage executed by Mrs. Lindsley, a widow, to Mr. and Mrs. Phare, and prayed that such property be sold to pay a deficiency decree, if any be rendered in foreclosing the purchase money mortgage. A deficiency…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Anderson v. TruemanSupreme Court of Florida · 1930
  2. Phare v. RandallSupreme Court of Florida · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API