Legal Opinion

Ambriano v. Bowman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 15, 1997Published

1Opinion of the Court

The Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discre*405tion in denying those branches of the respective motions of the third-party defendants which were to dismiss the third-party complaint. Similarly, the court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in ordering a severance of the third-party action. The third-party plaintiff unduly delayed in commencing the third-party action, the parties in the main action have substantially completed their discovery, and would be prejudiced by the delay necessary to allow the third-party defendants to engage in discovery (see, Cusano v Sankyo…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cusano v. Sankyo Seiki Manufacturing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  2. Zuckerman v. La Guardia HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API