Holland v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
CRENSHAW, Judge.
Cody Shane Holland appeals his conviction and sentence for burglary of an unoccupied dwelling. We affirm the conviction and sentence. Because the trial court made an oral determination that. Holland was competent but failed to render a written order to that effect we must remand the case to the trial court for entry of a nunc pro tunc order finding Holland competent to stand trial.
Holland argues that he was deprived of due process because the trial court failed to make an independent determination that Holland was competent to proceed with trial and instead allowed counsel to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bernard J. Dougherty v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 2014
- Fowler v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1971
- Corbitt v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
- Hampton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
3Cited by14 opinions
- KERVEN CHARLES v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
- MATTHEW v. HAWKS v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
- Gordon v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
- WILLIAM SALLEE v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
- B.R.C. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.