Legal Opinion

Webb v. Mott

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1852PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Mr. Field, of counsel for the defendant, moved to set aside the summons and complaint in this action for irregularity.

1Opinion of the Court

Crippen, Justice.

The summons is not in conformity with the provisions of the Code. The complaint which was served on the defendant with the summons, sets up a cause of action *440not arising on contract, but one founded in tort for a malicious .arrest and prosecution of the plaintiff, and claims damages therefor.

Under such a complaint the summons should have contained the notice required by section 129, sub. 2 of the Code. In short there is no doubt but that the summons in this case is irregular and should be set aside, unless the irregularity has been waived or cured by the acts of the defendant…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bronson v. EarlNew York Supreme Court · 1819

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Macomber v. Mayor of New YorkThe Superior Court of New York City · 1860
  2. Browning v. MosesAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1908
  3. Bender v. ComstockThe Superior Court of New York City · 1865

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API