Legal Opinion

Matter of Aioss v. Sardo

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 20, 1928PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

There is here a distinct and independent contract with the employee. (Workmen’s Compensation Law [Cons. Laws, ch. 67], sections 10, 25, 50, 54.) So the policy itself provides. It adds “ the obligations and promises of the company as set forth in this paragraph shall not be affected by the failure of the employer to do or refrain from doing any act required by the policy,” and further that the company shall be bound by any award rendered against the employer. Under these circumstances, as between the insurance carrier and the employee the fact that a policy is issued upon untrue statements…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hastings v. . Westchester Fire Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1878

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Claim of Cruz v. New Millennium Construction & Restoration Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. Points v. WillsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Matter of Di Donato v. RosenbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  4. Bates v. NelsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1949
  5. AMERICAN MILLENNIUM INS. CO. v. BerganzaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2006

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API