Legal Opinion
Cobb & Gregory v. Parker
Texas Commission of Appeals
Decided June 24, 1922No. 288-3542PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSpencer, P. J.
In their motion for rehearing, defendants in error for the first time suggest fundamental error in this: That the acts of C. A. Lord as special judge, who was appointed by agreement of the parties to try and who did try this case, were null and void because the disqualification of the regular judge, Hon. J. Llewellyn, is not shown of record. The agreement of the parties is as follows:
“The State of Texas, County of Hardin.
“At a term of the Seventy-Eifth judicial district court, January term, begun and holden at ICountze, Tex., on the 6th day of January, A. D. 1919, within and for the county of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Parker County v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1893
- Dunn v. Home Nat. BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
3Cited by4 opinions
- Randel v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1949
- Lancaster v. BushCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
- White v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931
- Lancaster v. BushCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924