Legal Opinion

Chamberlin v. Reed

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1860PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the Seventh District.

1Opinion of the CourtCope, J.

Field, C. J. concurring.

Where an appeal regularly taken is dismissed for want of prosecution, the dismissal operates as an affirmance of the judgment, and a second appeal cannot be allowed. The only mode of avoiding the consequences of such dismissal is to move, during the term or before the remittitur has gone out, to vacate the order and reinstate the cause. The appeal must be dismissed, and it is so ordered.

See Karth v. Light (15 Cal).

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Chase v. BeraudCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
  2. People v. CantrellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  3. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. Clark CA1/2California Court of Appeal · 2016
  4. Marriage of Shio CA4/3California Court of Appeal · 2020
  5. State v. BiesmanMontana Supreme Court · 1892