Legal Opinion

Bowery Bank v. Hart

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1902PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Action to foreclose a mortgage.

1Opinion of the CourtBlanchabd, J.

This is an action brought to foreclose a mortgage given by defendants to the plaintiff to secure the payment of a certain note, which was the subject of a suit then pending by the plaintiff against the defendants herein. It was provided in the mortgage that it should be void upon payment of the note, with interest, “ together with all the costs and expenses incurred by said party of the second part in a certain action now pending in the Supreme Court of this State, wherein said party of the second part is plaintiff and said Max Hart and Frieda Hart are defendants.” The note was not paid at…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Agawam Bank v. . StreverNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  2. Kohn Bros. v. ZimmermanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1872
  3. Milk v. WaiteNew York Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. City of Utica v. Gold Medal Packing Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1967
  2. In re the Estate of HookerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API