James A. Rochelle v. Commissioner
United States Tax Court
1ConcurrenceBeghe, J.
My impression is that it was due to mere inadvertence, a ministerial omission, that respondent’s employees charged with the responsibilities of preparing and sending the notice of deficiency failed to stamp the date for filing the petition at the appropriate space provided on the notice form; it was not with the intention of flouting the expressed will of Congress. After all, the Commissioner has redesigned the statutory notice form so that it provides a space for stamping the date by which the petition must be filed; the vast majority of the statutory notices that are issued bear the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Wichita Term. El. Co. v. Commissioner of Int. R.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1947
- Shea v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1999
- McCormick v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1970
- Smith v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2000
- Albert J. Fihe and Elizabeth Fihe v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.