Legal Opinion

Alto v. City of Cannon Beach

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 25, 2012No. 082665; A142171PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, P. J.

Petitioners appeal a judgment dismissing their writ of review proceeding concerning respondent City of Cannon Beach’s decision that, pursuant to section 5(3) of Ballot Measure 49 (2007), respondents George and Alexis Larsen (the Larsens) have a vested right to complete and continue the development of the use described in their Ballot Measure 37 (2004) waiver. For the reasons set forth below, we conclude that, because petitioners have failed to establish statutory standing under ORS 195.318 — a statute establishing the requisites for challenging, by writ of review, a local government’s vesting…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Strawberry Hill 4 Wheelers v. Board of CommissionersOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Friends of Yamhill County, Inc. v. Board of CommissionersOregon Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Dodds v. City of West LinnCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Concienne v. AsanteCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  2. Givan v. State (In re Estate of Nelson)Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API