Legal Opinion
Clyman v. Glasser
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 9, 1963PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSamuel C. Coleman, J.
Three members of the Bar, one of them also and essentially a certified public accountant, were named executors and trustees under a will. In the course of exercising their functions as executors, they opened a checking account and a savings account in the defendant bank, in the name of the estate. Withdrawal of funds in each account was to be made only upon the signatures of all three executors, later (and so during the period to be mentioned) changed to two. In September, 1960 two of the three, Clyman and Marks (the latter, lawyer and accountant) learned that the third, Glasser, in the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bischoff v. . Yorkville BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Morgan v. United States Mortgage & Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1913
- Grace v. Corn Exchange Bank Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1941
- Clarke v. Public National Bank & Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1932
- Stella Flour & Feed Corp. v. National City BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- First National City Bank v. Compania De Aguaceros, S. A.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1968
- Jewett v. Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1965