Legal Opinion · Dissent

Crampton v. City of Royal Oak

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 1961No. Docket 60-64, Calendar 48,794, 48,795, 48,796, 48,911, 48,912Published

1DissentBlack, J.

“This is admittedly a case of first impression, not only in Michigan but throughout the land. No court has ever been presented with the issue of the validity of a redevelopment project* such as is proposed here.”

*528Such is the candid salutation of the defendant city’s brief. It brings to focus the portentous nature of our decision and its impact as other mall-bent municipalities wait upon release of these opinions.

I agree, with Mr. Justice Carr, that the assessment of property for special benefits cannot be based upon assessed valuations and that assessments so levied should be pronounced…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Thomas v. GainMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Fluckey v. City of PlymouthMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
  3. New York Central Railroad v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API