Legal Opinion
Russell v. Second National Bank of Paterson
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided October 21, 1947PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Case, Chief Justice.
Miss Eussell, a retired schoolteacher, suffered material losses as a result of a fraud practiced upon her by Ered Baron, alias Ered Bloom, and Ernest T. Brasch, alias Henry Williams. Baron and Brasch were indicted for the fraud, entered pleas of non vult and are serving sentences thereunder in the State Prison. The appel lant bank honored the checks which had been fraudulently obtained but which, drawn and signed by Miss Russell against her account in that bank, came to it in the course of business from a correspondent bank.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Land Title & Trust Co. v. Northwestern National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
- Robertson v. ColemanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886
- Emporia National Bank v. ShotwellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1886
- Halsey v. Bank of New York & Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Mercantile National Bank v. SilvermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Radiant Burners, Inc., an Illinois Corporation v. American Gas Association, Peoples Gas Light and Coke CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1963
- In Re the Investigation of the Death of MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2003
- Commercial Credit Corporation, a Corporation v. Empire Trust Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1958
- Palatini v. SarianNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
- United States v. McGovernCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.