Legal Opinion

Pugh v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 2004No. 48S02-0412-CR-533PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SULLIVAN, Justice.

The Court of Appeals held that the trial court lacked authority to order less than the entire amount of the sentence originally suspended when it revoked Defendant Sandy Diane Pugh's probation. Following our opinion in Stephens v. State, we hold that when a trial court revokes a defendant's probation, it may order less than the entire amount of the sentence originally suspended.

On August 28, 2000, Defendant Sandy Diane Pugh pled guilty to public intoxication, resisting law enforcement, and escape. The trial court sentenced Defendant to five years imprisonment and ordered…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Stephens v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. Pugh v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bussberg v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. Rosa v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. Sandlin v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Kenneth Galvin v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. Steven R. Bean v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API