Legal Opinion

Rukavina v. Accounts Supervision Corp.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 5, 1951No. 21464PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDew, P. J.

Bespondent, as plaintiff in the trial court, brought this action in equity to cancel a chattel mortgage as usurious and to recover insurance premiums and excess interest paid, together with reasonable attorney’s fee, and for general relief. The court decreed the chattel mortgage to be set aside and canceled and awarded to plaintiff $15.63 excess interest paid, plus $200 attorney’s fee, a total of $215.63, with costs. Defendant has appealed.

In his amended petition filed June 3, 1948, plaintiff alleged that on December 17,1947, he applied to the defendant for a loan of $100 and in return for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McBroom v. Scottish Mortgage & Land Investment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. GoldsmithMissouri Court of Appeals · 1945
  3. Whitworth v. DaveySupreme Court of Missouri · 1919
  4. Lawler v. VetteMissouri Court of Appeals · 1912

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Securities Investment Co. v. Finance Acceptance Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1971
  2. Lomax v. SawtellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1956
  3. Wilner v. O'DONNELLMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Julian v. BurrusMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. W. M. Crysler Co. v. SmithMissouri Court of Appeals · 1964

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API