Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ayers v. Fay

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 26, 1940No. 29044Published

1DissentDavison, J.

I cannot concur in the conclusion reached in the majority opinion. I find no fault with the rules of law set forth in the syllabus, but in my opinion paragraphs 5, 6, and 7 thereof do not apply to this cause, unless it can correctly be determined that the specific finding of the trial court (quoted verbatim in the majority opinion) which is in effect a finding that the evidence is insufficient to show that “the property, money, and funds” in the hands of the defendant as executrix of the estate of William E. Snow, alias Roy Fay, deceased, is any part of the property or funds of the Stanley…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Johnson v. RoweSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  2. Apple v. HertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  3. Winter v. KleinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API