Legal Opinion

People v. Landaverde

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided February 7, 2018No. B282107PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALL, J.*

*290We affirm the denial of appellant's motion to vacate his 1998 plea of guilty to committing a lewd act with a child under the age of 14 in violation of Penal Code section 288, subdivision (a).1 This motion, which was brought pursuant to the procedural mechanism set forth in section 1473.7, was based on the substantive allegation that appellant's Sixth Amendment right to the effective assistance of counsel was violated by his trial counsel's supposed failure to research and advise him of the immigration consequences of that plea.2

We conclude that (1) section 1473.7 provided a…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Padilla v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  4. Jae Lee v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
  5. Chaidez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. Ogunmowo, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  2. People v. OgunmowoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API