Legal Opinion
Martin v. Reynolds
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 19, 1928No. 18340PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
DIFFENDAFFER, C.
This is an action in unlawful detainer, brought by defendant in error, hereinafter designated as plaintiff, against plaintiff in error, hereinafter designated as defendant, in the city court of Muskogee. The cause was tried in that court and judgment rendered for plaintiff. Defendant appealed to the district court, where judgment was again rendered for plaintiff. Defendant appealed to this court where the judgment first rendered in the district court was reversed and remanded for new trial for failure of defendant in error to file brief. Martin v. Reynolds, 114 Okla. 151, 245…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Stiles, Treasurer v. City of GuthrieSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1895
- Lookabaugh v. EppersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Rogers v. McCord-collins Mercantile Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
- Haynes, Admx. v. City Nat. Bank of LawtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Nichols & Shepard Co. v. BakerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1903
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Beam v. BerrymanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930