Waterman's Estate v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1DissentFrank, Circuit Judge
I begin with these first principles of income taxation: Although Congress, as it states in § 22(a), intends to include in gross income all gains “derived from any source whatever”, it does not intend that deductions for losses should be taken except as Congress expressly permits. In § 23(e) (2), it does permit a deduction of a loss incurred in a “transaction entered into for profit, though not connected with the trade or business”.1 The courts hold that the quoted words mean that the taxpayer’s motive or “state of mind” is crucial, that a loss is not deductible if he lacked a domi*246nant profit…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Campbell v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1945
- Herbert's Estate v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1943
- Hatch v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
- Marx v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1945
- Early v. AtkinsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1949
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.