Marshall v. Aubuchon (In Re Marshall)
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KENNETH J. MEYERS, Bankruptcy Judge.
At issue in these cases is whether the debtors may avoid the landlord’s hens of the defendants, all of whom leased real estate to the debtors for agricultural purposes.
The facts are not in dispute. Prior to filing their Chapter 12 bankruptcy petition, the debtors, Michael and Anne Marshall, entered into several farm leases. Three of the leases (Aubuchon, Ruyle, McEvers leases) were written agreements that contained a provision for a landlord’s hen on the debtors’ crops to secure the payment of rent. Another of the leases (Huff lease) was in writing…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- In Re King Furniture City, Inc.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1965
- Shurlow v. BonthuisMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
- First State Bank v. De Kalb BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
- Todsen v. RungeNebraska Supreme Court · 1982
- Faubel v. Michigan Boulevard Building Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1934
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Pogge v. Powers (In re Smith)United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. Illinois · 2003