Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. Buel
Nebraska Supreme Court
ERROR to the district court for Lancaster county: Albert J. Cornish, Judge.
1Opinion of the Court
Epperson, C.
Defendants in error, who were the plaintiffs in the lower court, brought this action for the recovery of alleged damages to their crops and other property caused by the diverting of the water of Balt creek, a natural watercourse. In 1893 the railroad company -constructed the railroad running in a northerly and southerly direction through the east half of section 32, township 8, range 6, in Lancaster county, Nebraska, upon which land were two forks of Salt creek, about 80 rods apart, over each of which the railroad was constructed. In the first instance the railroad, which is about…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Omaha & Republican Valley Railroad v. BrownNebraska Supreme Court · 1883
- McCleneghan v. Omaha & Republican Valley RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1889
- Omaha & Republican Valley Railroad v. BrownNebraska Supreme Court · 1884
3Cited by2 opinions
- Fairbury Brick Co. v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1907
- Buel v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1908