Legal Opinion

Patel v. Comm'r

United States Tax Court

Decided October 1, 2008No. 15491-06UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BHARAT I. PATEL AND VIBHA B. PATEL, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

Patel v. Comm'r

No. 15491-06

United States Tax Court

T.C. Memo 2008-223; 2008 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 221; 96 T.C.M. (CCH) 202;

October 1, 2008, Filed

Jon J. Jensen, for petitioners.

Melissa J. Hedtke, Trent Usitalo, and Blaine Holiday, for respondent.

Haines, Harry A.

HARRY A. HAINES

MEMORANDUM FINDINGS OF FACT AND OPINION

HAINES, Judge: Bharat I. Patel (Mr. Patel) and Vibha B. Patel (Mrs. Patel) petitioned the Court for redetermination of the following deficiencies in Federal income tax and penalties:

*2*Penalties

Ye…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. New Colonial Ice Co. v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Cohan v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
  3. Spies v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. Corliss v. BowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  5. Vanicek v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1985

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Minchem Int'l v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API