Legal Opinion

Limouze v. MM & P. MARITIME ADV., TRAIN. & ED. S. PRO.

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided June 10, 1975No. Civ. A. No. M-74-911Published

1Opinion of the Court

397 F.Supp. 784 (1975)

Arthur Sanford LIMOUZE, Plaintiff,

v.

M. M. & P. MARITIME ADVANCEMENT, TRAINING, EDUCATION AND SAFETY PROGRAM, et al., Defendants.

Civ. A. No. M-74-911.

United States District Court, D. Maryland.

June 10, 1975.

N. Gregory Silberberg, Baltimore, Md., for plaintiff.

Edward Pierson and W. Michel Pierson, Baltimore, Md., for defendants.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JAMES R. MILLER, Jr., District Judge.

Plaintiff, Arthur Sanford Limouze, filed suit against the "International Organization of Masters, Mates & Pilots, Maritime Advanced Training Education and Safety Program (A New York Trust)" and…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Davis' AdministratrixSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Greenough v. Tax Assessors of NewportSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. E. P. Coverdell v. Mid-South Farm Equipment Association, Inc., and Mid-South Farm Equipment Association Insurance TrustCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1964
  4. Yonce v. Miners Memorial Hospital Ass'nDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1958
  5. Boyle v. RiderCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1920

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API