Legal Opinion
Murphy v. Creative Foods Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 4, 1991PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (LeVine, J.), dated July 13, 1989, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The plaintiffs are not foreclosed from bringing the instant action in light of the recent case of Santangelo v State of New York (71 NY2d 393). It is now well established that a police *442officer cannot recover damages for injuries sustained as a result of the negligence that created the occasion for his services…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Santangelo v. State of NYNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Starkey v. Trancamp Contracting Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Wynne v. TollmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Burnside v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1989
- Dawes v. BallardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
3Cited by8 opinions
- Maisch v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Addolorato v. Safeguard Chemical Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Rubsam v. AlexanderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Magnees v. GlandorfAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Iaccarino v. Welland Estates, Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.