Legal Opinion · Dissent

Utah Power & Light Co. v. Idaho Public Utilities Commission

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1984No. 14433Published

1DissentBakes, Justice

The majority in this case is in effect ruling that Utah Power & Light’s only recourse from an adverse PUC order, which denies them the right to collect fees to which they are entitled and thus confiscates their property, is for Utah Power & Light to request a stay of the order pending appeal and post a bond. The Court holds that if Utah Power & Light fails to post such a bond pending appeal, then even though the utility’s property has been effectively confiscated there is no hope of recovery because of the failure to file such an appeal bond. By denying the utility a right to impose a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Frizzell v. SwaffordIdaho Supreme Court · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API