Gresham v. State

Mikell, Judge.

A jury found James Gresham guilty of one count of entering an automobile with intent to commit theft. On appeal, Gresham argues that the trial court erred by admitting impermissibly suggestive identification evidence. Gresham also challenges the sufficiency of the evidence and the denial of his motion for directed verdict. We affirm.

As recognized in cases such as Shabazz v. State, 1 on appeal from a criminal conviction, the evidence is viewed in a light most favorable to the verdict. We do not weigh the evidence or determine witness credibility but only determine whether the…