Legal Opinion

OGELSBY v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 13, 2021No. 2:19-cv-05598Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA LAMAR OGELSBY, : CIVIL ACTION Petitioner, : : v. : NO. 19-cv-5598 : TAMMY FERGUSON, et al., : Respondents. : MEMORANDUM SITARSKI, M.J. July 12, 2021 Presently before the Court is Petitioner’s counseled Corrected Motion for Leave to Amend Habeas Petition While Federal Proceedings Are Stayed or, in the Alternative, to Lift Stay for the Purpose of Allowing Amendment (Corrected Mot. to Am., ECF No. 27), the Commonwealth’s response thereto (Resp., ECF No. 28), and Petitioner’s reply in support (Reply, ECF No. 31). For the…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Rose v. LundySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Rhines v. WeberSupreme Court of the United States · 2005

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API