Legal Opinion

In Re the Welfare of J.S.J.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided June 11, 1996No. CX-95-1791Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KALITOWSKI, Presiding Judge.

Appellant J.S.J. challenges his adult certification arguing the district court abused its discretion by: (1) denying a motion for an extension of time; and (2) concluding J.S.J. did not rebut the presumption in favor of certification.

FACTS

On June 11, 1995, J.S.J., a 16-year-old resident at Spring Hill Group Home, struck a counselor over the head with a wooden dowel. At the direction of J:S.J., he and two other juveniles stole Spring Hill’s van, taking three counselors as hostages at knifepoint. After the juveniles stole cigarettes from a store, an off-duty…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dunshee v. DouglasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  2. In Re Welfare of T. D. F.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  3. Welfare of S. R. J. v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  4. Stevens v. GearSupreme Court of Iowa · 1949
  5. In re the Welfare of K.M.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API