In Re the Welfare of J.S.J.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KALITOWSKI, Presiding Judge.
Appellant J.S.J. challenges his adult certification arguing the district court abused its discretion by: (1) denying a motion for an extension of time; and (2) concluding J.S.J. did not rebut the presumption in favor of certification.
FACTS
On June 11, 1995, J.S.J., a 16-year-old resident at Spring Hill Group Home, struck a counselor over the head with a wooden dowel. At the direction of J:S.J., he and two other juveniles stole Spring Hill’s van, taking three counselors as hostages at knifepoint. After the juveniles stole cigarettes from a store, an off-duty…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Dunshee v. DouglasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- In Re Welfare of T. D. F.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Welfare of S. R. J. v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Stevens v. GearSupreme Court of Iowa · 1949
- In re the Welfare of K.M.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996