Legal Opinion

McEntire v. McEntire

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 1923No. 17675PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

'ay, J.:

1. In an action in the nature of a creditor’s bill, to nforee collection of a judgment for alimony ob-rined by the wife against the husband, a court of quity has power before enforcing such judgment to lake a conditional decree requiring the wife to make estitution of property obtained in lieu of alimony reretofore agreed upon with her husband, or, if res-tution be not made, enjoin the collection of the adgment for alimony upon the cross-petition of the usband, it being inequitable to permit the wife to nforee the judgment for alimony and at the same ¡me retain the property obtained…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Coleman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  2. Strunk v. Chromy-StrunkNebraska Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Seeds v. SeedsOhio Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Coleman v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  5. Bender v. VaughanOhio Court of Appeals · 1958

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API