Legal Opinion

In Re: Jordana Marinkovic Bauman

District Court, S.D. California

Decided April 16, 2025No. 3:24-cv-01564Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 IN RE: JORDANA M. BAUMAN, Case No.: 24-CV-1564 JLS (BLM) 12 Debtor, ORDER: 13 14 (1) DENYING APPELLANT’S MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE 15 MEL MARIN, APPEALS, FILE LONG BRIEF, AND 16 Appellant, CLARFIY PARTIES AND ISSUES; 17 (2) REQUIRING APPELLANT TO 18 MICHAEL KOCH, PERFECT THE RECORD; AND Appellee. 19 (3) SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE 20 AND DIRECTING APPELLANT AND APPELLEE TO ADDRESS 21 STANDING IN THEIR BRIEFS 22 (ECF No. 33) 23 24 Presently before the Court is Appellant Mel Marin’s Motion to Consolidate Appeals 25…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. C.E. Pope Equity Trust v. United States of America, Richard L. Stradley, Trustee, Etc. v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  2. Johns v. County of San DiegoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  3. In the Matter of Harry Fondiller, Debtor. Rosalyn Fondiller v. Jerome E. RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  4. Omstead v. Dell, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  5. Norman D. Carter and Cecilia P. Carter v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API