Legal Opinion

Nickerson v. Lee

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided January 27, 1997No. 95-P-1245PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGreenberg, J.

Aggrieved by the final judgment dismissing her medical malpractice claim against the defendant, Dr. Yhu H. Lee, the plaintiff, Carol M. Nickerson, appeals. A medical malpractice tribunal2 found her offer of proof deficient because a letter from a podiatrist, Dr. Jeffrey R. Coen, did not provide an explicit statement that the defen*107dant departed from the applicable standard of care. The plaintiffs motions for reconsideration and to supplement the offer of proof were denied. We conclude that the plaintiffs offer of proof, if substantiated at trial, is sufficient to raise a legitimate question of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Little v. RosenthalMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  2. Kapp v. BallantineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  3. Gugino v. Harvard Community Health PlanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  4. Bradford v. Baystate Medical CenterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
  5. Blood v. LeaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Lambley v. KamenyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1997
  2. Heinrich Ex Rel. Heinrich v. SweetCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
  3. Bailey v. Cataldo Ambulance Service, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2005
  4. Cooper v. Cooper-CiccarelliMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2010
  5. Feliciano v. AttanucciMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2019

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API