Legal Opinion

United States ex rel. Rauch v. Stockinger

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided February 16, 1959No. Misc. No. 2189PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BYERS, Chief Judge.

A Writ of Habeas Corpus was granted bearing the above caption, to inquire into the legality of the custody of the U. S. Marshal for this District into which the relators were ordered, pending their extradition to Canada, at the instance of the Government of that country.

The Commissioner before whom the proceeding was laid pursuant to Tit. 18 U.S.C. § 3184, has decided and determined that “the prosecution has, by ample evidence, established probable cause that the crime of larceny as contained in the Penal Law of Canada, and as defined by the Treaties and Supplementary…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Factor v. LaubenheimerSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Wright v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  3. Grin v. ShineSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  4. Pierce v. CreecySupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  5. Glucksman v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1911

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States of America Ex Rel. Sol R. Rauch and Harold D. Rauch, Relator v. Joseph Stockinger and Alex KrinskyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
  2. United States ex rel. Rauch v. StockingerDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API