Legal Opinion
Boggs v. Boggs
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided July 18, 1996No. 94-30178Published
1Per curiam
A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the reconsideration of this cause en banc, and a majority of the judges in active service not having voted in favor, rehearing en banc is DENIED.
2DissentWiener, Circuit Judge, joined by Politz, Chief Judge, and King, Benavides, Stewart and Parker, Circuit Judges,
My concerns about the panel majority opinion in this case prompted me to request a poll of the active judges of this court to rehear the case en banc. In the ensuing poll, less than a majority of the judges voted to rehear the case. With the utmost respect, I dissent from the refusal of a majority of the active judges of this court to rehear this case en banc.
I
WHY EN BANC?
The instant…
3Cases cited28 opinions
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. McClendonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.