Legal Opinion

Enoch v. Inman

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 1, 2004No. COA02-1410PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GEER, Judge.

Plaintiff Valerie Enoch appeals the trial court’s order granting defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiff’s race discrimination claims. Although, unfortunately, the complaint fails to specifically reference any statute as the legal basis for the claim, we hold that its allegations are sufficient to state a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Although defendants contend that a public sector employee may only challenge race discrimination by filing a claim under Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., a review of United States Supreme Court decisions and the legislative history of Title VII…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination UnitSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Horne v. Cumberland County Hospital System, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  2. Hinson v. City of GreensboroCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
  3. Hill v. StubHub, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
  4. Izydore v. TokutaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015
  5. In Re Fifth Third Bank, Nat. Ass'nCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API