Legal Opinion

Moore v. Follett

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 15, 1928No. 9154. [fn*]PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGraves, J.

Appellants challenge the correctness of a judgment rendered by the trial court, sitting without a jury’s aid, vesting, as against themselves, in the appellees — according to their severally determined interests — the title and possession of all the Samuel Moore 100 acres of land in the John McNeel league in Brazoria county, except the surface rights in an undivided one-half of the 80 acres remaining out of the 100 after what was known as the Irene Moore 20 acres had been deducted therefrom.

In doing so, they attack, as unwarranted under the law and evidence, these findings and conclusions of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Pope v. BeauchampTexas Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Leahy v. TimonTexas Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Progressive Lumber Co. v. Marshall & East Texas Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Trinity Gravel Co. v. CrankeTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926
  5. Farmers' Nat. Bank of Stephenville v. DaggettTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. RitchieCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  2. Texas Cotton Growers Ass'n v. McGuffeyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  3. Jordan v. CopelandSupreme Court of Alabama · 1961
  4. Maribel F. Gutierrez, Nicole D. Gutierrez, Ashley Marie Gutierrez, Omar Hector Gutierrez, Jr. as Representatives of the Estate of Omar Gutierrez, Caroline Gutierrez, Homero Alberto Gutierrez, and Roberto Carlos Gutierrez v. Elva Gutierrez, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API