Legal Opinion

Crowder v. Lindbergh

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 23, 1954No. 39,188PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Wedell, J.:

This is an appeal by Jim Carothers Tire Company, Incorporated, intervenor, in a replevin action instituted by R. C. Crowder against the defendant, Ray W. Lindbergh, to recover certain personal property. Plaintiff’s action was based on a note and chattel mortgage. The above-mentioned intervenor had sold the personal property involved to the defendant Lindbergh under an alleged conditional sales contract. Another intervenor, Scott Motors, Incorporated, claimed a lien on the property involved. Only the first-mentioned intervenor has appealed…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kininmonth v. CarsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1943
  2. Smith v. Kansas Transport Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1951
  3. Barker v. FlemingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1944
  4. Hardman Lumber Co. v. SpitznaugleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1930
  5. Bisagno v. LaneSupreme Court of Kansas · 1949

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. TurnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
  2. King v. KingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
  3. McCarty v. Kansas-Nebraska Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1954
  4. Clarkson v. MangrumSupreme Court of Kansas · 1960
  5. Estate of Rosey v. KirkpatrickSupreme Court of Kansas · 1960

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API