Legal Opinion

Grant v. Meyer

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided September 2, 1987No. 84-1949Published

1Opinion of the Court

828 F.2d 1446

56 USLW 2154

Paul K. GRANT, Edward Hoskins, Nancy P. Bigbee, Lori A.

Massie, Ralph R. Harrison, Coloradans for Free

Enterprise, Inc., a Colorado

corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

Natalie MEYER, in her official capacity as Colorado

Secretary of State, and Duane Woodard, Colorado

Attorney General, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 84-1949.

United States Court of Appeals,

Tenth Circuit.

Sept. 2, 1987.

William C. Danks, Denver, Colo., for plaintiffs-appellants.

Maurice G. Knaizer, First Asst. Atty. Gen., Denver, Colo., for defendants-appellees.

Before HOLLOWAY, Chief Judge, and BARRETT, McKAY, LOGAN,…

Also in this document: Dissent · Barrett; Dissent · Logan.

2Cases cited67 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. ButtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Steffel v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API