Legal Opinion

Cottonham v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Decided June 6, 2022No. 5:21-cv-01013Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA PEGGY COTTONHAM, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. CIV-21-1013-P ) KILOLO KIJAKAZI, ) Acting Commissioner of the ) Social Security Administration, ) ) Defendant. ) ORDER Plaintiff, appearing pro se and in forma pauperis, seeks judicial review pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) of the final decision of Defendant Commissioner denying her application for disability insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 423. Defendant has answered the Complaint and filed the administrative record (hereinafter AR___),…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Biestek v. BerryhillSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  2. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Barnhart v. WaltonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Grogan v. BarnhartCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  5. Wall v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API