Legal Opinion

Blaney v. City of Salem

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 3, 1894PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolmes, J.

This is a petition for the assessment of damages caused by the respondent’s taking of flats belonging to the petitioner, under St. 1886, c. 324, and St. 1887, c. 409. At the trial the petitioner was allowed to testify to “ the best plan to develop the flats taken, to get the most out of them,” which he stated was to build stores on them, stating modifications in the mode of building if fifteen feet adjoining the next estate had to be left open, and if the dock was not filled up. The respondent excepted.

It hardly is denied that, if the flats had been unencumbered and the petitioner had had a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Maynard v. City of NorthamptonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
  2. Allen v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1884

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Menici v. Orton Crane & Shovel Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  2. Neal v. JeffersonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  3. Lincoln v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895
  4. Jackson v. InnesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
  5. Shea v. HudsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API