Legal Opinion
Cornelius Corey v. Faye Daniels
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided October 6, 2015No. 15-6707UnpublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Affirmed in part, vacated in part, and remanded by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2Per curiam
Cornelius Maurice Corey appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012), and dismissing his amended claims without prejudice for failure to exhaust. Because we conclude that the amended claims were dismissed prematurely, we vacate in part and remand for further proceedings.
“Whether a district court properly required a plaintiff to exhaust [his]…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- Jones v. BockSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Woodford v. NgoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Porter v. NussleSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Moore v. BennetteCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2008
- Talbot v. Lucy Corr Nursing HomeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
4Cited by7 opinions
- Ryricka Custis v. Keith DavisCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2017
- Byrd v. StirlingDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2015
- Andrews v. HemingwayDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2022
- Fleming v. Director Bureau of PrisonsDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2022
- Gratton v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2022
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.